That is description of this several types of paper at COLING 2018

it is vital to select the paper that is right in purchase to assist get high quality reviews for the work. Keep in mind that all paper kinds make use of the template that is same download your message and LaTeX templates right here: coling2018.zip

Computationally-aided analysis that is linguistic

The main focus of the paper kind is brand brand brand new insight that is linguistic. It could take the type of an empirical study of some linguistic sensation, or of a theoretical result of a linguistically-relevant system that is formal.

1. Relevance: Is this paper relevant to COLING?
2. Readability/clarity: Through the real method the paper is written, are you able to inform just exactly just what research concern ended up being addressed, that which was done and just why, and just how the outcome connect with the investigation concern?
3. Originality: How initial and innovative may be the research described? Originality could possibly be when you look at the linguistic concern being addressed, within the methodology placed on the linguistic concern, or perhaps in the mixture associated with the two.
4. Technical correctness/soundness: could be the extensive research described in the paper theoretically sound site right here and correct? Is one to trust the claims for the paper—are they supported by the analysis or experiments and tend to be the results precisely interpreted?
5. Reproducibility: can there be adequate information for some body in identical industry to reproduce/replicate the outcomes? n/a for several forms of theoretical results
6. Data/code access: could be the data/code (as appropriate) open to the study community or perhaps is here a reason that is compelling why this isn’t feasible?
7. Generalizability: Does the paper show just just exactly how the outcomes generalize, either by deepening our knowledge of some linguistic system in basic or by demonstrating methodology that may be placed on other dilemmas too? n/a for several forms of theoretical results
8. Meaningful contrast: Does the paper clearly destination the described use respect to literature that is existing? Can it be clear both what exactly is novel into the extensive research presented and just how it develops on previous work?
9. Substance: performs this paper have sufficient substance for a paper that is full-length or would it not reap the benefits of further development?
10. General suggestion: there are lots of good submissions contending for slots at COLING 2018; essential can it be to feature this 1? Will people discover a complete great deal by looking over this paper or seeing it presented? Please be decisive—it is way better to vary from other reviewers rather than grade every thing at the center.

NLP engineering test paper

This paper type fits the majority of submissions at current CL and NLP conferences.

1. Relevance: Is this paper relevant to COLING?
2. Readability/clarity: From the method the paper is written, could you inform just what research concern ended up being addressed, that which was done and just why, and just how the outcomes relate solely to the study question?
   1. Could it be clear what the authors’ hypothesis is? What exactly is it? A text input reponse
   2. Could it be clear how a writers have actually tested their theory? y/n
3. Originality: How initial and revolutionary may be the research described? Observe that originality could include a unique strategy or a brand new task, or it might lie within the careful analysis of what the results are whenever an understood strategy is placed on a known task (where in fact the pairing is novel) or into the careful analysis of what goes on each time an understood strategy is placed on an understood task in a language that is new.
4. Technical correctness/soundness: could be the extensive research described in the paper theoretically sound and proper? Is one able to trust the claims for the paper—are they sustained by the analysis or experiments and they are the results precisely interpreted?
   1. Will it be clear the way the outcomes confirm/refute the hypothesis, or will be the outcomes inconclusive?
   2. Perform some writers explain how a outcomes follow from their theory (rather than state, other feasible confounding factor)?
   3. Will be the datasets utilized demonstrably described and so are they suitable for testing the theory as mentioned?
5. Reproducibility: can there be adequate information for some body in identical field to reproduce/replicate the outcome?
6. Data/code access: could be the data/code (as appropriate) open to the study community or is here a compelling explanation offered why this isn’t feasible?
7. Error analysis: Does the paper provide a thoughtful mistake analysis, which searches for linguistic habits within the kinds of mistakes produced by the system(s) examined and sheds light on either avenues for future work or the supply of the strengths/weaknesses of this systems?
8. Significant contrast: Does the paper clearly put the described make use of respect to current literary works? Could it be clear both what exactly is novel within the extensive research presented and just how it develops on earlier in the day work?
9. Substance: performs this paper have sufficient substance for a paper that is full-length or wouldn’t it take advantage of further work?
10. General suggestion: there are lots of submissions that are good for slots at COLING 2018; essential can it be to feature this 1? Will people discover great deal by scanning this paper or seeing it presented? Please be decisive—it is way better to vary from other reviewers rather than grade every thing in the centre.